<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: complications</title>
	<link>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/</link>
	<description>Blog for the diabetics who use an insulin pump to control diabetes</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: jerrold16</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/#comment-25389</link>
		<author>jerrold16</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/#comment-25389</guid>
		<description>Brian, I think the key word here is entirely. You have a much better chance
of avoiding or delaying complications if you maintain good a1c's. In fact,
you may delay them so long you die of something else first! Also, if you do
develop complications, with good a1c's you may also limit the severity of
them ie having some slight kidney impairment rather than needing dialysis.

Also, remember too we are in the infancy of medical treatment. It may be in
the not too distant future, any complications could be cured by taking a
week's worth of meds. Who knows? But, if your bg's are not in control, you
may not live long enough to see it, or it may be too late. So PLEASE work to
keep your bg's and a1c's in good range!

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I think the key word here is entirely. You have a much better chance<br />
of avoiding or delaying complications if you maintain good a1c&#8217;s. In fact,<br />
you may delay them so long you die of something else first! Also, if you do<br />
develop complications, with good a1c&#8217;s you may also limit the severity of<br />
them ie having some slight kidney impairment rather than needing dialysis.</p>
<p>Also, remember too we are in the infancy of medical treatment. It may be in<br />
the not too distant future, any complications could be cured by taking a<br />
week&#8217;s worth of meds. Who knows? But, if your bg&#8217;s are not in control, you<br />
may not live long enough to see it, or it may be too late. So PLEASE work to<br />
keep your bg&#8217;s and a1c&#8217;s in good range!</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosemary_170</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/#comment-25387</link>
		<author>rosemary_170</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/#comment-25387</guid>
		<description>Hi. I've been reading the posts on this group for a while, but this
is my first time responding. I can only tell you of my situation,
Brian. I was dx'd in 1969 at the age of 12. Up until about 1983, I
certainly did not control my blood sugar levels. I started
attempting control in 1983, and thru the years have gotten much
better. After 32 years with Type I (and 3 pregnancies), I have
absolutely no complications. One doctor I had thought part of the
reason for my good health had to do with genetics, rather than
control. One thing is for sure - I certainly feel better when things
are under control!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I&#8217;ve been reading the posts on this group for a while, but this<br />
is my first time responding. I can only tell you of my situation,<br />
Brian. I was dx&#8217;d in 1969 at the age of 12. Up until about 1983, I<br />
certainly did not control my blood sugar levels. I started<br />
attempting control in 1983, and thru the years have gotten much<br />
better. After 32 years with Type I (and 3 pregnancies), I have<br />
absolutely no complications. One doctor I had thought part of the<br />
reason for my good health had to do with genetics, rather than<br />
control. One thing is for sure - I certainly feel better when things<br />
are under control!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olin Ok</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/#comment-25386</link>
		<author>Olin Ok</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/#comment-25386</guid>
		<description>I think it might be best to answer the inverse question; if you DO NOT control
your A1c you are almost certain to have complications. Nothing is perfect, but
by controlling the A1c you are bound to avoid most of the complications. But,
I understand there are exceptions to this statement. A review of the data
from the DCCT study would give more specific information....

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it might be best to answer the inverse question; if you DO NOT control<br />
your A1c you are almost certain to have complications. Nothing is perfect, but<br />
by controlling the A1c you are bound to avoid most of the complications. But,<br />
I understand there are exceptions to this statement. A review of the data<br />
from the DCCT study would give more specific information&#8230;.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie Mui</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/#comment-25385</link>
		<author>Jennie Mui</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetic.netslonguirado.com/2006/10/17/complications/#comment-25385</guid>
		<description>Probably depends if the A1c is the average of stable blood sugars or the
average of a bunch of very highs and very lows.. hmmm....Jeana Ü</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably depends if the A1c is the average of stable blood sugars or the<br />
average of a bunch of very highs and very lows.. hmmm&#8230;.Jeana Ü</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
