no donations

>a DMers eyes, heart, and kidneys would NOT be as good
>due to the probable damage.

Well, that makes sense. I’ve always been glad they won’t accept DMer
blood, because I absolutely HATE the idea of giving blood…and it’s nice
to have a medical excuse!

Laurie

12 Responses to “no donations”

  1. Scott Kattie Says:

    I frequently donate blood, and everytime (mostly
    because it’s on the questionaire) I tell them directly
    and certinaly. Yes, I have Type I diabetes. And
    everytime the response is, that’s fine, we’ll just be
    watching you a little closer and make extra sure you
    get plenty of juice before and afterward.

    Having dropped over 3 gallons since diagnosis I’m
    inclined to agree with their policy… it’s never
    effected me in the slightest…. well ONCE I was a bit
    dizy after getting up, but I also insisted on jumping
    off the table as soon as I was done (a dozen previous
    donations without incident had gotten me a little
    cocksure)


    Which reminds me, thank you, I havn’t been to the blood
    bank in well over 2 months, it’s time for me to visit
    the vampires.

    -Sara

  2. patience_15 Says:

    << Which reminds me, thank you, I havn’t been to the blood
    bank in well over 2 months, it’s time for me to visit
    the vampires.
    >>
    I was never sure on this either. If your blood sugar is up when you donate
    dosent that affect the blood someone may be getting? How does that work?
    Thanks Chrissy

  3. Scott Kattie Says:

    A) When a patient receives one unit of blood, that
    blood is effectively diluted into their blood stream
    (which is going to contain far more than one unit of
    blood otherwise they’d be dead already). And that high
    would get dampened by that effect.

    B) Short term highs really aren’t a terrible thing,
    especially in comparison to being dead for lack of
    blood.<RANT>THE SUPPLY OF BLOOD IN THIS COUNTRY IS
    EMBARRASINGLY LOW! DONATE TODAY! IT MAY BE YOU TOMORROW!
    </RANT>

    Now, one thing they *DO* do with diabetics is that they
    run a more accurate iron count (centrifuge as opposed
    to seeing if a drop of blood sinks in that windex

    stuff — if I recall correctly the minimum iron level
    is also higher for diabetics as a precaution) and they
    do a bg check. If you’re under 100md/dl (I think
    that’s the threshold but don’t take that to the bank)
    they’ll make you drink some juice and recheck until
    you’re higher (some will refuse you outright).

    Once, my iron level was too low, I hadn’t eaten red
    meat in months (and very little of other kinds of meat
    for that matter) nor had I had many baked potatos.

    -Sara

  4. Isaias Calhoun Says:

    According to American Red Cross criteria, the *only* thing that disqualifies
    a diabetic from donating blood (i.e. that makes the blood *unsafe* for
    someone else to use) is re-use of needles or lancets — AND THEY’RE NOT
    ALLOWED TO ASK! The rest of the treatment, at least in Georgia, is *exactly*
    the same as for non-diabetics. The rest may be reasonable cautions to
    protect diabetics, but there is nothing inherent in diabetes that renders
    the blood unsafe, and, except for possible state or local laws, there is no
    regulation that requires the additional testing.

    The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent those of
    my wife who runs this house and makes more important decisions than I do.

  5. Josiah Randee Says:

    If your blood sugar is up when you donate
    > dosent that affect the blood someone may be getting? How does that work?
    > Thanks Chrissy

  6. Isaias Calhoun Says:

    > I was told many years ago never to donate blood because I
    > once had hepatitis; is this still true?

    I believe so. FWIW, it isn’t to protect you, but the recipients. There are
    a significant number of people who have had hepatitis that become carriers.

    The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent those of
    my wife who runs this house and makes more important decisions than I do.

  7. Scott Kattie Says:

    The rest I don’t even recognize…

    -Sara

  8. Olin Ok Says:

    Thanks for the info, but what is ‘FWIW"?

    David

  9. Olin Ok Says:

    FWIW, I just figured it out….forget it!

    David

  10. Sharlene Latia Says:

    Donating blood….

    Will put on my professional hat for a moment. Type 1’s are not excluded in
    California…they don’t test iron, the floating drop is an indirect test of
    hematocrit or the ratio of RBCS/serum. You need a hematocrit of around 12 to
    donate. Hepatitis and several other diseases are exclusions, and the donated
    blood is tested for HIV, Hepatitis variations. Lots of drugs are exclusions,
    one that would definitely make the list, below is erythropoietin, as that is
    taken to stimulate bone marrow to produce more RBCS. Glucose is very labile
    in whole blood and a donation of a pint with a 400mg glucose would quickly
    disappear when transfused. I fact it is likely to disappear in storage, the
    RBCS consume it.

    Scott

  11. patience_15 Says:

    << Thanks for the info, but what is ‘FWIW"?
    >>
    Probably for whatever its worth. Chrissy

  12. colin_140 Says:

    >>
    That’s true Jan - there is supposed to be an extensive history taken and
    completed by the donor before they are considered for donatioin. HIV, CMV,
    and all the alphabet of Hepatitis screening is a standard nationally set by
    the CDC. Given all the meds and your history, they’d say thanks, but No
    thanks!!! Joan:)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.